RCPro 2008 Suggestions

[Steve K]

As RCPro continues to expand and re-develop, input is needed more than ever as to what kind of things you, the visitor, would like to see around the site. We are open to all suggestions, however we do ask that you refrain from posting things like "add more videos."

Some of the previous suggestions:

Pager System - In an effort to keep our forums modification free for future expansion and compatibility, the pager system will not be returning at this time.

PM Storage Space - With the launch of the new forums, all members now have a storage capacity for 500 messages.

Spotlight & Pro Designs - These two features will be returning shortly. More information to come.

RCPro Store - At this point in time, the store will remain closed. Items from the store will be given out as contest prizes in the immediate future. Possible launch of an RCPro Clothing Line may return with another supplier.

Forum Highlights on Main Page/SwitchBack - This feature will more than likely be making a comeback in the near future.

[Michael]

RCPro Store - At this point in time, the store will remain closed. Items from the store will be given out as contest prizes in the immediate future. Possible launch of an RCPro Clothing Line may return with another supplier.

I am very willing to pay for a few items to support Rcpro :cool:
(Plus they're sexy! :p)

[vekoma9]

I love switch back. Pl;ease make that come back very soon. With the design contest; I'll enter on that. I want a share in glory.

[rollercoasterfreek]

I do miss the "anything goes" threads where members can just talk about random stuff. Can we bring that back at all?

Is there also a way to advertise this website other than by link?

[disneylhand]

[quote=Steve K;1400]Spotlight & Pro Designs - These two features will be returning shortly. More information to come.

I'm looking forward to hearing more of this decision in the "What's Next?" thread.

-disneylhand

[Steve K]

Non-Coaster Related Forum - As repeatedly mentioned throughout the past two weeks, the Non-Coaster Related forum will not be returning in the foreseable future.

As for linking to us, please visit http://www.rollercoasterpro.com/linkus for details.

[3xinvert]

What about that old 'Mystery Coaster' game? Before I signed up, I saw that around here all the time...just a thought...

[sirloin]

The problem with Mystery Coaster is that it's borderline impossible to find someone to run it for any sustainable amount of time. Sure, people make their promises, but as time goes by, they lose their dedication.

Or at least that's what has been the case most of the time, if I remember correctly.

[Maxamillious]

^ Yeah. Speaking from personal experience here, Mystery Coaster was exciting to run and then my interest gradually declined over time. I personally think something like Mystery Coaster is best run with an automated system…

[jolash]

Ya know, you could find a load of pictures, batch edit the entire set, and then you have a numerous amount of pictures ready to go. I guess that's one step towards being "automated".

[Steve K]

Mystery Coaster - As a forum game, this will no longer be sponsored by RCPro. We may however include this in our newsletters which are still in planning stages as contests or just for fun.

[3xinvert]

At least its still being mentioned somewhere...

[Comet]

Non-Coaster Related Forum - As repeatedly throughout the past two weeks, the Non-Coaster Related forum will not be returning in the foreseable future.



Any reason?
I wasn't here when it was, so just wondering.

[Steve K]

Other changes to the community include the elimination of the 'Non-Coaster Related Forum.' The reasoning behind this was due to the fact that the majority of RCPro forum participation as of late was based in the [Non-Coaster Related] forum. In our attempt to concentrate on the amusement industry, it has been decided to remove this forum completely.Hopefully that explains it good enough. :)

[Matt]

VIP forums to come back?


Or do you have them and I'm just not cool enough to come back? ;P

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

No plans for VIP to be coming back. The elections for becoming a member were too much of an issue. Healthy amusement discussion can still be carried out on the public forums.

[sirloin]

Nevermind that the election process was done away with and it was decided that the only way someone could get in anymore was if a couple of us staff folks agreed... ;)

Yeah, that whole admission process I first came up with was entirely too confusing and a complete waste of time.

[rollercoasterfreek]

I think the VIP thing would exclude so many members. Since everything is so current, there is no point in having one yet.

[Steve K]

RCPro VIP - After failing twice, the RCPro VIP program will not be making a return as long as I'm still a part of RCPro...lol. Any benefits that would have gone towards VIP members will eventually be available to all members and guests of the site as they become available.

[sirloin]

I dunno, Steve. The VIP seemed decently active to me given its size. Perhaps with fewer members, the activity level would have seemed a little more impressive in proportion to the size of the group.

Still, though, there's no need for it right now. It accomplished its mission as best it could, so I'm satisfied.

[3xinvert]

RCPro VIP - After failing twice, the RCPro VIP program will not be making a return as long as I'm still a part of RCPro...lol. Any benefits that would have gone towards VIP members will eventually be available to all members and guests of the site as they become available.

This is the first I'm hearing about something like this-anyone care to fill me in from the last forums?

[thatdancingbear]

The old forums had a VIP section, where it was much more relaxed, like a super non coaster related forum...

[JD71]

Yeah, but not everyone was allowed in, I wasnt a VIP.
Eh, I'm actually kind of glad the VIP is gone now, now we're all back on the same platform instead of splitting us up based on the opinion of us. :p

[supremescreamer]

It wasn't as big of a deal as people make it out to be. I didn't even know which topics were from the VIP forum because since I pretty much only use the "view last topics since last visit" option.

[R.C.]

Why is the random coaster image thing on the home page not working? every time I log onto the home page it is always showing Sheikra, but the photo doesn't work. I noticed this a while ago, but I wanted to give you guys a chance to fix it. It may be just happening to me, but it's happened to me on three different computers. I hope you guys can fix it.

[Dan]

It's happening to me too. I have a feeling it has something to do with the transformation of the gallery over to the Lightbox program.

[Steve K]

We're working on getting all the photos in the gallery added into the random photo script and with over 4,500 pictures, having to edit 5 lines each manually is taking quite a long time. We are aware that this is down, and I apologize for the inconvenience.

[R.C.]

It really isn't an inconvenience, I just was wondering, and I think it looks sort of bad to anyone who is making their first visit to the site.

I'm glad you are aware of it. I can see how that would take a lot of time. Thanks for the quick response.

[jolash]

We're working on getting all the photos in the gallery added into the random photo script and with over 4,500 pictures, having to edit 5 lines each manually is taking quite a long time. We are aware that this is down, and I apologize for the inconvenience.

Now that you have a select few posted, I'd like to point out that the Dania Beach Hurricane random pics don't work.

[theRock-steel]

I'm all about lists and giving grades to things. Is there a way that everyone who wants to could list their top 10 favorite parks and give a grade to each ? Could they list their top 20 favorite coasters and give a grade to those ? We could see a graph so we know what the whole group thinks about where we have been and what we rode. I know that this would be a lot of work. Is there someone who has a fulltime job of managing this site ? I've seen other sites that do something like what I want but they didn't hit the nail on the head.

[Steve K]

Ride Counter/tracking/rating system is in the works for RCPro X and will hopefully completed by the end of next years season.

[theRock-steel]

^^ Great Steve; love ya bro. What is the "X" in "RCPro X" ? I didn't see that anywhere on the home page.

[Maxamillious]

Steve, have you seen the new Photo Flow, photo gallery system? RCPro should get that because it looks like it was Apple made. ;)

[rollercoasterfreak91]

Is RCPro Chat ever coming back? I used to come chat here when I was bored sometimes.

[Steve K]

RCPro Chat will return with RCPro X in the future, however at this time we will not be readding it.

[The Storm Runner]

Will our questions about Behemoth be answered? (Webmail)

[sirloin]

Those are about to go under their final review before submission. Finals are keeping me a little backlogged, but they end tomorrow morning. I'll be going over them then and sending them back to Mike to submit sometime tomorrow.

[The Storm Runner]

Ok, thanks. :)

[IntaminFan007]

Allowance of posts in forums other than the Roller Coaster Forum

[Jake]

Huh?

You can post in forums that aren't the coaster forum. Heck, your posting in this one are you not?

[thatdancingbear]

^^ I think he means the NCR...

[JD71]

I think he means post count...

[IntaminFan007]

Yeah, I have only 30 something posts and if you look at my posts themselves (in my profile), I have clearly much more then that. I think the posts I have had in the Gaming forum do not count towards my post count.

In my profile, there were 106 posts.

[MaverickManJZ]

What's NCR? Non Coaster Related? I don't see that forum.

[IntaminFan007]

^ yes. It is the Non-Coaster Related forum and all of its glory.

And I mean about the "Gaming" forum.

[Steve K]

Gaming forum does not and will not count towards post counts totals. As for the NCR (Non-Coaster Related), it will not be returning at this time or in the foreseeable future so I dont know why everyone keeps bringing it up.

[3xinvert]

^ I think that everyone keeps bringing up the NCR forum because they are either

(a) former members who just signed up again, and are noticing both subtle and large changes in the Community.

or...

(b) new members looking to go off-topic.

That's my theory.:cool:

[ArrowOwnzU]

Yeah, I have only 30 something posts and if you look at my posts themselves (in my profile), I have clearly much more then that. I think the posts I have had in the Gaming forum do not count towards my post count.

In my profile, there were 106 posts.

So? Why do you even care about post count, it doesn't do anything. Do you think that the more posts you have the better reputation you have? I have never understood the obsession with post counts and I never will. I have like, 20 or something and I could care less.

Quality, not Quantity.

[Dan]

I was browsing MacRumors' forum when I noticed that in a thread, the creator of the thread has some additional text in their info (see left side of screen) that reads: Thread Starter. They also use vBulletin and I thought it was a simple, informative feature that might be worth adding...just something to think about.

[Matt]

I think that bringing back the regional forums would be a nice idea. I hate how all the topics are now in one forum all mashed up.

[Jake]

^ Same. It feels a lot less organized now.

[3xinvert]

^Maybe this means I can finally put my 'East Coast Parks Threads' fishing net away...:D

I would like to see the regionals back up and divided again, also.

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

In part, this is one of the reasons the regionals were done away with. If we brought back the regionals, some people wouldn't even bother to check past their regional forum. Forums like Europe, Asia, Beyond wouldn't even get new posts but every other week. Remember, it was was like this on the old forum, and now considering post rate is on a decline, it wouldn't look pretty bringing it back.

Assuming the other, why should we have Regional Forums catered just to America? ...When only 1/4 of the Regional Forums gets new posts. Shouldn't we also have Regional Forums catered to Asia, or Europe, or South America? Yes we should, but a whole page of Regional Forums would look silly.

We don't see navigational problems as an issue for a couple reasons. Any current/modern topics will obviously be near the top of the page as they keep getting bumped with new posts. Otherwise, that's what search is for.

It doesn't matter where you live or what you like, we're all one-in-the same and like amusement parks.

[thatdancingbear]

^ I remember after a week the X2 thread was three pages back behind so many topic's with 3 posts total that just died, with the regular ones up in front when I had a picture to post.

I don't see it as a problem, I know where most of the threads I read are. Maybe the subscription system is worth looking into?

[Maxamillious]

^ There is already a thread subscription feature. Use it. ;)

[thatdancingbear]

^Exactly what I mean. I don't use it, I just keep the RCPro bird black on all the forums...

[p0tat0]

Is there any notifications available for comments in groups?


It sucks having to visit them one by one to check for new comments.

[YourNameHere]

i think we should make a thread catagory that lets you talk about news or events that arent about rollercoasters

[p0tat0]

You sir, have a brilliant idea.

[Jake]

...the non-coaster related forum... what a brilliant idea!

Wait! I have a better idea!

How about you make a site that has a forum in which you talk about everything EXCEPT for roller coasters! Doesn't that sound great?

[Michael]

i think we should make a thread catagory that lets you talk about news or events that arent about rollercoasters

And why else would you come to rollercoasterpro.com? :roll_eyes:

[rollercoasterfreak91]

Non-Coaster Related Forum - As repeatedly mentioned throughout the past two weeks, the Non-Coaster Related forum will not be returning in the foreseable future.

[JD71]

For the user galleries: Can we have a way to see how many times a gallery or picture has been viewed, and is it possible to have a comment feature for pictures?

[YourNameHere]

well, i mean on other forums they do have on of those things, so then you cantalk about local stuff, and the news, well at least p0tat0 agrees with me

[sirloin]

We had one up until a large portion of our membership abused it. Anyone we lost because of the loss of that forum is someone the site is better off without. When the staff believes that the membership is mature enough to handle one again, I'm sure they'll add a NCR forum.

[p0tat0]

Abused--mature enough--sounds like you're our parents, taking away our privileges, but oh well. The members don't have say on this site. We don't own it, we just post.


\/true

[Jake]

Since it isn't our website, we don't have any privileges - as it should be ;).

[Steve K]

More features will be included in the groups as well as the personal profile galleries once we upgrade to vBulletin 3.7 gold. No timeline set for that.

As for the non-coaster related, it is possible that it will return in the future. When and in what form is not something we are talking about at this time, however we cannot rule it out in the future.


Abused--mature enough--sounds like you're our parents, taking away our privileges, but oh well. The members don't have say on this site. We don't own it, we just post.


Members always have a say, and we do listen. But you're right, we own it and we as staff must make the decision on what to do, and what not to do, with the sites' best interest in mind. A lot is planned, and our goals for RCPro are constantly progressing and advancing. We do what we feel will benefit the site, and our visitors (you guys), the most while still sticking with our fundamental goals and visions.

Most of our members are mature, and abused could possibly be the wrong word. However, when you have only one amusement industry post for every 20 NCR posts by a large portion of the visitors, it makes you wonder why they joined an enthusiast website. And in turn, detracts from the site as a whole. RollerCoasterPro.com has always been about coasters, theme parks, and other forms of amusements, and when theres a drastic shift from that to non-related stuff, we need to step in and get the focus back on what this site is about and what people join this site for.

But we've been over this many times already and I guess if it hasn't sunk in yet, it probably won't. Your guys' input is always welcomed, and always listened to. It may not seem like it because we've been quiet as of the last six months as far as our goals go, however, be assured we are working very hard to get things rolling for and I have no doubt that you guys are going to like the things that are coming.

Just have faith guys...

[Maxamillious]

As a part of my internship with NVIDIA I'm test driving a couple of different MP3 players and I must say that the web browsing capablities are astounding on the iPod Touch. Have you ever considered creating a mobile version of the site or fourms in the next version? I sat in on just three meetings yesterday that make or breaks where NVIDIA invests its next $100 million and the common theme with every company in those meetings full mobile internet with Apple having set the standard. My personal belief is that it would be in RCPro best intrest to go mobile in the near future, offering high-quality content to users not only on their personal computers but on their mobile devices -- on the midway.

[p0tat0]

Alright that's cool Steve. I believe in you!

Like what Eminem said to Dr. Dre

Well I'm with you homie!

[thedeadfrog]

For convenience...How about putting the "My Profile" Link back into Qlinks?

[JD71]

^Its still there, just the text for it isn't. Click the small blank box under Subscribed Threads. :p

[thedeadfrog]

Oh hey, I don't know if this is a suggestion more than a flaw in my mind that makes me notice such things...But the spelling for "Spinning Wild Mouse" Type of Spinball Whizzer reads "Spinnig Wild Mouse.

Just noticed this in the random photo thing that pops up on the homepage...

[Steve K]

Thanks for the heads up, I'll take care of it.

[Brandon]

I was wondering, is there anyway we can get a bulk uploader for Photo Uploads, or maybe increase the number of files per upload? It gets annoying when you can only upload 5 photos at a time.

[Steve K]

Once vB 3.7 gold is released, we will update the boards, which will include new features, including commenting capabilities on photos. In order to prevent server resource use from skyrocketing, we will increase the number to 10 max at a time, and should 3.7 provide better server resource handling for that feature, we will re-attack that issue.

[Youhow2]

How bout sub forums in our user groups, so we can have structured discussions about our user group topics?

Maybe a faster link to the social groups page?

[Mike T]

Keep in mind the reason for eliminating the non-coaster discussion was to create more of an emphasis on the Amusement Industry...

[Maxamillious]

Steve, have you heard anything about vB releasing a mobile version of the forums in a future release/update? It'd be nice to have a version of the forums specially suited for the iPhone. :)

[Youhow2]

That would be like a ncr wouldnt it? Maybe it would be like a "reformed" NCR.

I mean, look at the user groups... Were bound by the topics of the groups, and only meaningful topics pertaining to noteworthy things are being discussed, such as the Rcpro movie critics. Providing forums for the groups would allow for more meaningful discussion on certain topics pertaining to the groups... but it would also increase traffic to the groups, due to more meaningful discussion.

We understand the concept of RCpro being a coaster place, but if this is the case, why do the social groups even exist?

[Dan]

That would be like a ncr wouldnt it? Maybe it would be like a "reformed" NCR.

I mean, look at the user groups... Were bound by the topics of the groups, and only meaningful topics pertaining to noteworthy things are being discussed, such as the Rcpro movie critics. Providing forums for the groups would allow for more meaningful discussion on certain topics pertaining to the groups... but it would also increase traffic to the groups, due to more meaningful discussion.

We understand the concept of RCpro being a coaster place, but if this is the case, why do the social groups even exist?Stop pushing the NCR forum. It's not coming back, and if it ever does, it won't be because some members argued about it. You seem to be one of the only advocates of the forum. At this point, the rest of us have moved on, I suggest you do the same.

We could pin a million reasons on why the groups are good. Maybe they spark other interests in people which allows them to further communicate through AIM with people who have the same interests. I've had conversations about politics with many coaster friends since the NCR forum left. I could have movie conversations if I was interested - I could see who else was.

Sorry if any of this came off rude, but really, it's time to let go.

[p0tat0]

I don't get all the negativity against NCR. Seems like every time it gets bought up it ends up being no rational discussion about it. Of course we all know this is a roller coaster site, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss over things.

[Dan]

I don't get all the negatively against NCR. Seems like every time it gets bought up it ends up being no rational discussion about it. Of course we all know this is a roller coaster site, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss over things.It's been discussed a thousand times over and the outcome is always the same...

[p0tat0]

That's the problem

[Brandon]

That would be like a ncr wouldnt it? Maybe it would be like a "reformed" NCR.

I mean, look at the user groups... Were bound by the topics of the groups, and only meaningful topics pertaining to noteworthy things are being discussed, such as the Rcpro movie critics. Providing forums for the groups would allow for more meaningful discussion on certain topics pertaining to the groups... but it would also increase traffic to the groups, due to more meaningful discussion.

We understand the concept of RCpro being a coaster place, but if this is the case, why do the social groups even exist?


I don't get all the negatively against NCR. Seems like every time it gets bought up it ends up being no rational discussion about it. Of course we all know this is a roller coaster site, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss over things.

The point of the elimination of the NCR forum was that it was being abused, and it had more daily posts than any of the other forums, which is embarassing for a ROLLER COASTER website.

Everytime I see the NCR forum brought back up, it annoys me to no end. I've kept my mouth pretty much shut everytime it is brought up, and I bite my lip; But not this time. It is dead and gone. Life goes on and so should you Gary, and the same goes for you Youhow. Just let the NCR die. We all have moved on.

Everytime you bring up the thought of the NCR forum, you get the same answer and that is "The NCR is not coming back", or something to that extent. If you have gotten that answer everytime you have brought it up, why do you persist on bringing it back up?

Please, do us all a favor and as Dan said, stop pushing the NCR forum.

[p0tat0]

why do you persist on bringing it back up?Because I like to question such things

It's all good man. I don't see why everyone gets worked up about it that's all. Actually I can answer my own question, because it keeps on getting brought up and shut down. I believe NCR makes RCPro more of a community than a forum. I know I'm in the minority for saying so, but I just want to give my views on it. That's all.

[Jake]

Listen Gary, I like ya, you're a cool guy. But by the end of the NCR's stint guys that used to be the stuff like you went by the wayside and were only posting in the NCR. It got frustrating seeing guys I used to look up to not even talk about coasters anymore. If you want to talk about movies there are movie related websites, same goes for politics, cars, music, anything and everything is out there. And if you want to discuss such things then go find a place where it belongs.

[Youhow2]

Okay, I suggest forums for the sub groups, so inside them we can have organized discussion. Mike compares it to the NCR. I then see how it could be like the NCR, and do one of my not so very often "NCR Reform post" . An hour later I return to the forum, and I got Brandon and Dan coming off rudely , telling me to let the NCR die, with only Gary in my defense.


I dont understand the hatred towards the NCR. I really dont. It's dead. I understand.

Everytime at the slightest metion It seems everyone feels they need to lecture me about how the NCR is dead, baby me, and tell me it's time to move on, and the funny thing to me is that it's usually users younger than me.

I only wanted to suggest a social group style such as the one myspace has, to allow for structured discussions in the social group area. It would actually be cleaner and more presentable then the layout is now.

And as far as users are concerned, I've always been one for "dont start no s**t wont be no s**t". Please dont start s**t... This elitest movement within the forum is starting to get annoying.

[p0tat0]

I only wanted to suggest a social group style such as the one myspace has, to allow for structured discussions in the social group area. It would actually be cleaner and more presentable then the layout is now.That's what I was thinking. I think if we get notified of the posts in the groups it can work.

[Jake]

Everytime at the slightest metion It seems everyone feels they need to lecture me about how the NCR is dead, baby me, and tell me it's time to move on, and the funny thing to me is that it's usually users younger than me.

Isn't it amazing how maturity has so little to do with age?

[Dan]

This elitest movement within the forum is starting to get annoying.By adding things in like this you're going to get people annoyed.



Everytime at the slightest metion It seems everyone feels they need to lecture me about how the NCR is dead, baby me, and tell me it's time to move on, and the funny thing to me is that it's usually users younger than me.On an internet where people can lie about their age, numbers are nothing and maturity is everything.



And as far as users are concerned, I've always been one for "dont start no s**t wont be no s**t". Please dont start s**t... This elitest movement within the forum is starting to get annoying.You know mentioning the NCR "starts s**t, so if you are an advocate of that phrase, don't bring it up.

[Mike T]

I don't see "hatred" of the Non Coaster Forum, but it was decided upon that by eliminating it from the discussion, it would help to entice industry focused topics into the community. It's not meant as a depriving 'tactic' towards the members, it's just a new step in a different direction. I'm sure you've noticed a lot of changes happening with RCPro over the past year or so, and I hope you find positive aspects from what we're doing; but the elimination of the Non Coaster Forum was something that was deemed necessary in order to keep going in the direction that we're going in. From my opinion, there's been a dramatic change in how discussion is carried out on RCPro, a change that I find not only positive, but appealing to others who might want to sign up on the site and post their own input.

Also to the poster's above, please keep in mind the forum policies before you use derogatory comments in your messages.

[p0tat0]

I don't see "hatred" of the Non Coaster Forum, but it was decided upon that by eliminating it from the discussion, it would help to entice industry focused topics into the community. It's not meant as a depriving 'tactic' towards the members, it's just a new step in a different direction. I'm sure you've noticed a lot of changes happening with RCPro over the past year or so, and I hope you find positive aspects from what we're doing; but the elimination of the Non Coaster Forum was something that was deemed necessary in order to keep going in the direction that we're going in. From my opinion, there's been a dramatic change in how discussion is carried out on RCPro, a change that I find not only positive, but appealing to others who might want to sign up on the site and post their own input. I do like the new changes to RCPro it's much different than what it was a year ago. I would like to thank you all for doing so. It is interesting to see more members joining almost everyday! The way discussion is carried out now can be attributed to many things such as, more updates, more members, and the forum being consolidated to only a couple forums. Doesn't necessarily mean the removal of NCR is the main reason of doing so, but I would agree it contributed to the increased discussion in roller coasters.

lol and Mike
It's not meant as a depriving 'tactic' towards the members, it's just a new step in a different direction. That's what the communists said* :stick_tongue:


*No I don't think RCPro is going in the same direction as communism lol

[Steve K]

As Mike said, we evaluated the removal of the NCR forum thoroughly several times in the past 2 years, even while Brandon was still in charge of the site. When we confirmed the direction of the site we wanted to follow, we decided it was time to remove the NCR section, as well as the consolidation of other forums.

We still stand by that decision, however we will not rule out that in the future changes may be made again. As with anything, things change as time goes on. RCPro must be able to adapt to the various situations and do what needs to be done to ensure the success of the site.

Now as for a 'forum' in the usergroups, that may be a feature that is available in vB 3.7 gold, however at this time we do not have that capability. Once/if that option becomes available, we will evaluate it.

I expect no more discussion on the NCR forum, why it should be brought back or the opposite in the public forum. If you have suggestions concerning that, please feel free to contact one of the staff members privately. It is getting tiring seeing the same things brought up again and again. Here is the final word on that topic: At this time the NCR forum will not return in the foreseeable future, however we do not rule out the possibility of its return.

[Youhow2]

.

Now as for a 'forum' in the usergroups, that may be a feature that is available in vB 3.7 gold, however at this time we do not have that capability. Once/if that option becomes available, we will evaluate it.



This is all I wanted to hear. Thanks Steve.

[rollercoasterfreak91]

I think it would be really useful to have the option to change the name of threads that you have created.

[Mike T]

Double click on your thread (but not the text) and you'll be able to change the title of it. Its very simple.

[JD71]

I've known about that feature, it hasn't worked for me in a while. The only way I can get thread title changing to work is by moving the thread, but its too inconvenient.

[Steve K]

All users should now be able to edit their thread title either by doing as Mike has suggested above, or you can also edit the first post of the thread and the change should take effect as well. Please let me know if you are still having this problem. Please note that you may have to clear your cache should there still be an issue.

Also JD, had you mentioned it earlier, we could have taken care of it sooner. We as admins are always able to edit things, therefor an incorrect setting doesn't affect us. So if there's a problem with general user's settings, we don't know about it until we're informed of it!

Hope this helps. :)

[JD71]

Sorry Steve, didn't cross my mind, but thanks for fixing it.

[Steve K]

No Problem whatsoever. :)

[Michael]

I'm liking the new banner and navigation :smile:

[Dan]

I like the banner, but the nav seems like a step back.

[Steve K]

The previous navigation bar was very unprofessional and didn't quite fit in right. The Network Navigation bar was added to allow quick transition between the RCPro Network websites. The header image is temporarily still staying the same, however will be replaced by a higher quality image/s in the very near future. :)

[Michael]

^ "Image/s", I like the sound of that :wink2:

[p0tat0]

Very nice Im loving it

edit: Are other sites going to add that as well? That would definitely connect all the sites together very well

[JD71]

The previous navigation bar was very unprofessional and didn't quite fit in right.

To be honest, this nav bar looks less professional to me. The only thing I saw wrong with the previous is that it would split apart in larger screens.


The Network Navigation bar was added to allow quick transition between the RCPro Network websites.

I'm going to be honest here. When I first saw it, I thought spam. I know about the network sites, and the ones I visit are in my bookmarks folder or toolbar. I already know about the network page, its easier, more "professional", and all around better than the flip down. Like I said, just being honest.


Well, I'm not fully disappointed with this, as you said its not complete, and some parts are still temporary, but for what you've added so far, I feel like it could be better.

-JD

[RocketSledder77]

I think it looks pretty amateur and doesn't flow.

[Michael]

I like the font, but maybe if you took off the brackets the nav bar would look better :001_cool:

[Jake]

I have to side with Daniel, as I don't understand why you need to advertise your network partners so heavily. Especially since most of them are not returning the favor. It just seems like a way to get people to click a link and never come back to the site. However I do like the new text for the nav bar, right underneath the banner. It'd be great if you could get the rest of the site to have a similar text so it flows better :).

[Dan]

As I am a network partner I'm sure my opinion has a slight bias, but I think the the affiliates bar looks somewhat attractive - though it doesn't fit in with the rest of the page very well. As for the new navigation bar, well, how is it anymore professional than the old one? In fact, what made the old one unprofessional? How is just plain text more professional then text with a graphic surrounding it? Seems to me it's usually the other way around.

[rollercoasterfreak91]

I agree with Dan, it's good, but it doesn't fit. Maybe when you change the rest of it it'll fit better. And I really don't see the point of the network partners bar...I already know about the sites and I know how to find them. If there was a way to show the most recent update to the site as well, I would like the idea more. Just an idea. And I'm looking forward to the new banner; RCPro has had Colossus for a long time. *hopes for a coaster in CA to be on there:D*

EDIT: One more thing: If you could make the network partners sites open in a new window, that would be more convenient.

[Michael]

I think it's a great way for many of the coaster sites to stay connected and attract more visitors. I think it's a good addition :001_cool:

[Jake]

^ The problem is, RCPro is the only one with that feature. So we're getting the short end of the stick as it were.

[ArrowOwnzU]

The network bar seems like it should stay with the page.

[JD71]

Well for now, I'll be using the iPhone skin. God I love Safari's dev mode.
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9552/devmodete4.jpg

[Steve K]

Navigation bar was redone because the graphics just did not fit at all. Replacing it with a solid navbar flowing all the way across the screen enables a cleaner look, not to mention the option to add additional links easily. Like was previously said, still a work in progress. Some seem to think I shouldn't launch things without getting opinions first, however I disagree and believe the best opinions are those that are going to have to 'deal' with them every day. Nothing against those individuals, but that's how I felt this should be done.

As for the Network bar, Yes, we are the only ones adopting it. It is up to our partner sites if they wish to do the same as well, however we are not going to force them. Do we lose visitors by providing links to others, maybe, however that is just a siggn that we need to still improve and that our work is not finished in terms of rejuvenating the site.

The Network has sat idle for way to long, and the features I promised our Network partners have not been fulfilled. However I feel that it is time to deliver on those promises I've made. With each website that is added to the network, we gain a new friend. In todays world, its not what you know, its who you know. And the more people you know, the better. Having a vast collection of high-quality partners will allow us things that standard affiliation cannot provide and will in turn benefit us.

[Jake]

In todays world, its not what you know, its who you know. And the more people you know, the better. Having a vast collection of high-quality partners will allow us things that standard affiliation cannot provide and will in turn benefit us.

I'm sorry but I do not see how being an affiliate with BGEscape is going to benefit you in anyway, besides maybe getting a few links. Meaning no offense to the site, as it's a great one, but I'm not sure what you think you're getting out of this network.

[Michael]

I'm sorry but I do not see how being an affiliate with BGEscape is going to benefit you in anyway, besides maybe getting a few links. Meaning no offense to the site, as it's a great one, but I'm not sure what you think you're getting out of this network.

Let's put it this way, how is the new affiliates bar bad? It doesn't take anything away from the site, in fact if anything it adds to coaster network. It's not detracting visitors, I mean to be honest Rcpro is one of the better sites out there. No one is going to 'run away'. So why not have it? :tongue:

I just don't understand why people are complaining over something they can simply ignore if they choose to. I beieve people will find it useful; able to get more information about certain areas across the world.

[Jake]

Let's put it this way, how is the new affiliates bar bad? It doesn't take anything away from the site, in fact if anything it adds to coaster network. It's not detracting visitors, I mean to be honest Rcpro is one of the better sites out there. No one is going to 'run away'. So why not have it? :tongue:

Because when people click a link on that bar they're taken to another site in the same window that was browsing RCPro. So there is a good chance they wont come back after clicking that link.

Lets put it this way, how is this bar benefiting RCPro in any way, shape or form?

[Michael]

people will find it useful; able to get more information about certain areas across the world.

That's how it is beneficial. And people will come back to RcPro because they know they can get good information from us and our affiliates. :cool1:

[Jake]

That's how it is beneficial. And people will come back to RcPro because they know they can get good information from us and our affiliates. :cool1:

That's.. not how it works, Michael. We don't have to worry about any of our solid members leaving and not coming back. But what are we telling a new visitor the site when the first thing they see is a way to get off the site. If they're clicking on a link that takes them a way from the site almost immediately, how can they know that RCPro is worth coming back to?

[p0tat0]

As for the Network bar, Yes, we are the only ones adopting it. It is up to our partner sites if they wish to do the same as well, however we are not going to force them. Do we lose visitors by providing links to others, maybe, however that is just a siggn that we need to still improve and that our work is not finished in terms of rejuvenating the site.

The Network has sat idle for way to long, and the features I promised our Network partners have not been fulfilled. However I feel that it is time to deliver on those promises I've made. With each website that is added to the network, we gain a new friend. In todays world, its not what you know, its who you know. And the more people you know, the better. Having a vast collection of high-quality partners will allow us things that standard affiliation cannot provide and will in turn benefit us.

Awesome I hope other sites will follow...besides someone has to start it.


I'm sorry but I do not see how being an affiliate with BGEscape is going to benefit you in anyway, besides maybe getting a few links. Meaning no offense to the site, as it's a great one, but I'm not sure what you think you're getting out of this network.

It's a benefit to all of us as enthusiasts. It makes it easier for all of us to gain the information that we want. Theres no real competition involved, that's why theres a network. All the sites work to keep on updating their share of amusement park news. If one site has better information than RCPro and more people flock there then that's ok.

I think the network is a great idea and I hope other sites adopt the bar as well.

[R.C.]

I think the RCPro network bar is fine. I do wish that it would open in a new window or tab, but I can ignore it if I want to. I also like the logout option being near the top of the page again, it's just easier to use. Great job guys!

[Michael]

II do wish that it would open in a new window or tab, but I can ignore it if I want to.

You can change that in your browser settings :cool1:

[Steve K]

^^Still looking into that...for some reason the javascript isn't allowing it. Along with the logout button being back on top, the missing QLinks links are back and functioning again.

[R.C.]

You can change that in your browser settings :cool1:

Yeah, but I don't want every link to open in a new window or tab.

[SnooSnoo]

Very nice Im loving it

edit: Are other sites going to add that as well? That would definitely connect all the sites together very well

We will look into it at Coasterforce.

New site looks sexy tho. :)

[Steve K]

Thanks SnooSnoo, glad to know a partner is even considering it. :)

Just some minor tweaks to the javascript, and all links now open in a new window. Also, instead of going to our homepage when clicking the left side of the Network Bar, it now goes to the Network page. :)

[rollercoasterfreak91]

Sweet, I like that much better. Thanks.

[Brandon]

I noticed how whenever I try to press enter to start a new line, and then hit preview post, it mashes the whole thing up into one big paragraph, with no spaces inbetween sentences. It's probably just a result of the forum upgrade, but I thought I would bring this up so it could be fixed.

[Michael]

I noticed how whenever I try to press enter to start a new line, and then hit preview post, it mashes the whole thing up into one big paragraph, with no spaces inbetween sentences. It's probably just a result of the forum upgrade, but I thought I would bring this up so it could be fixed.

^ You need to set your forum editing settings back. It changed them for me, so I had to go back into all of my settings.

[Miller Lite]

I'm relatively new so you might have this for all I know but a rcpro trip every once in a while like tpr does would be awesome!

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

I'm relatively new so you might have this for all I know but a rcpro trip every once in a while like tpr does would be awesome!

This hasn't been a direct foci of interest to us due to demographics, peddling, among others. Subsequently, we will address each opportunity presented on an individual basis and take the best course of action.

[Jake]

Even if RCPro did a major trip like Theme Park Review does, most of the members are under eighteen and would not have the funds (let alone their parents permission) to go on such a trip. It just wouldn't be worth doing at this point in time, although it would be cool in a few years.

[Jake]

Excuse the double post, but I think that more uptime would definitely be a plus. ;)

[Renegade]

What's happened with the webmail? I really REALLY need to get into mine. RCPro, I'm not happy that you haven't restored the webmail. That should be a top priority, as I depend on it. :mad:

[Mike T]

I'm sorry that you're not happy with it, but we're doing things as fast as we can, one step at a time. Sometimes you have to understand that there are underlying circumstances surrounding why things are not the way they previously were. RCPro is still in the recovering stages... the email is coming... please be patient... we apologize for the inconvenience.

If you have any more questions please contact me via aim or electronically at mthorp@rollercoasterpro.com

[Steve K]

What's happened with the webmail? I really REALLY need to get into mine. RCPro, I'm not happy that you haven't restored the webmail. That should be a top priority, as I depend on it. :mad:

As Mike previously said, we apologize that you are not happy with our service, and we are doing everything we can to get RCPro back online 100%. Since only a few of the 60+ accounts that have registered for an email account have actually logged in within the last 6 months, RCPro Mail was not our highest priority, however it was a priority nonetheless.

RCPro Mail service has now been restored and should be functioning properly. However at this time we will no longer be accepting new account registrations for the immediate future. More words on this to come shortly.

A formal announcement concerning our downtime will be up shortly.

[TheLegendaryMatthew]

How about some statistics of the rides. Like a miniature rcdb with more hidden info.

[Michael]

How about some statistics of the rides. Like a miniature rcdb with more hidden info.

That would be a bit hard with how many thousands of photos are up on Rpcro :p

[Jake]

So, I think the current on-ride media policy is both inconsistent, and a bit ridiculous.

Why on ride media from parks where it is perfectly legal is being deleted, is beyond me. I should be able to post pictures from the Matterhorn and not receive an infraction, nor should I see my media deleted. It is generally common knowledge, that unless otherwise stated on-ride media is perfectly legal at all Disney theme parks.

In short, I think it would be good if RCPro could realize that not all on-ride media is illegal for starters. And then remove the ban on said legal on-ride media immediately. As the general outlook on RCPro is becoming gradually more and more negative every time media is deleted even when no park rules have been broken.

Just something to think about..

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

So, I think the current on-ride media policy is both inconsistent, and a bit ridiculous.

Why on ride media from parks where it is perfectly legal is being deleted, is beyond me. I should be able to post pictures from the Matterhorn and not receive an infraction, nor should I see my media deleted. It is generally common knowledge, that unless otherwise stated on-ride media is perfectly legal at all Disney theme parks.

In short, I think it would be good if RCPro could realize that not all on-ride media is illegal for starters. And then remove the ban on said legal on-ride media immediately. As the general outlook on RCPro is becoming gradually more and more negative every time media is deleted even when no park rules have been broken.

Just something to think about..
There's a two reason explanation for this:


It's not within our realm of sensibility, or feasibility, to go track-down one venue's on-ride admissions policy. Nor should either staff be eligible, or required, to take advanced time to prove, or validate, the authenticity and legality of said photography.
No matter the rules or policies set forth and enacted per venue, the danger and harm of bringing loose items on high speed attractions remains present at all times. Even under controlled conditions.
As a result, if said photography is questionable for legitimacy, hazardousness, safety, or other means, it's best not to publicly share it within this domain.

[Jake]

But is it within your responsibility to control the "safety" of RCPro members? I can understand if such activity was illegal, but when the activity is perfectly legal.. that just doesn't seem logical to me. Will you stop members from driving cars because it is inherently dangerous? Granted this is not a perfect analogy, but you get what I'm after.

Also, shouldn't all staff members be able to prove that their actions are correct? I think part of the problem is that staff members tend to just "do whatever" because they can. That certainly leaves many visitors, including myself with a bad taste in their mouth.

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

But is it within your responsibility to control the "safety" of RCPro members? I can understand if such activity was illegal, but when the activity is perfectly legal.. that just doesn't seem logical to me. Will you stop members from driving cars because it is inherently dangerous? Granted this is not a perfect analogy, but you get what I'm after.
By definition of your "legal," I challenge you to present me with documentation (not oral) thus supporting the approval of on-ride photography within a Disney Resort.

It is also "legal" for freedom of speech, which includes racial, slanderous, and obscene material...however these entities are also censored under protective rights of offensiveness. Following such notion, RCPro believes that we should need not harbor unauthorized or unsafe practice. Even if there may be support contra, majority rules that it's opposed, and thus, it's best to remove.


If you have any further questions on the subject, feel free to IM, Email, or PM me.

[JD71]

Oh boy, my favourite subject, the taboo art of onride media!


I should be able to post pictures from the Matterhorn and not receive an infraction, nor should I see my media deleted. It is generally common knowledge, that unless otherwise stated on-ride media is perfectly legal at all Disney theme parks.
For me, I've actually never seen anything that says its okay. It's just been, like you said, general knowledge. Kind of like someone with a provisional license driving a sibling. Its not really legal here in California, but people think it is, and if a cop pulls you over, they just give you a warning. I have seen nothing from Disney saying it's ok, but then again, I haven't seen anything saying its not ok. I think that might be why people think its ok at Disney, because they haven't heard its not okay. I'm not sure on that statement though, someone please give me some insight on it, and not just he said she said.


Why on ride media from parks where it is perfectly legal is being deleted, is beyond me.

In short, I think it would be good if RCPro could realize that not all on-ride media is illegal for starters
I for one never saw how taking your camera on a ride was illegal. Yes its against park policy, but if it was truly a law, then wouldn't it be illegal at all parks, on all rides? Maybe I'm just going crazy... If it really is a real law, someone get me some info on it.

I understand that onride media is bad because its unsafe in many cases. Without the proper technique, a camera is a loose object, a lawsuit waiting to happen. But what about when it isn't a loose object? What about when you have a wrist strap? With a wrist strap the camera becomes an extension of your arm put simply. Also, when you mount a camera to a train correctly, its a part of the train, its not going anywhere. For me, I think parks just say no cameras as a safety thing. Like I said, when done incorrectly and without care it is a lawsuit waiting to happen. But what about when the proper steps are taken?

Also, whats with ride-op approval not being good enough? This person works at this ride day in day out every week and its his/her job to keep you safe. When you say ride-op approval isn't good enough, you're saying the person doesn't know how to do their job. You're saying that You know better than someone who does it for a living. These people know whats safe and whats not, and when you say they have no say, who do you think you are?

Months ago I had a chat with Steve K, the site owner about station shots. Pictures taken inside the train, but while its not in motion, and still in the station. He said you have to have proof that the restraints are up, like in this shot:
http://nltrack.com/_ptr/6_1/Images/162.jpg
Pic credit to Billy.

Seriously, where is the real line to this? You don't need to see the restraints to know that its in the station, stationary. I remember I got under fire for this type of pic end of 07, and I know others that have been too. Is a pic taken in a stationary train as dangerous as a pic in a train in motion?


I'm not saying I support onride media, I hate it when people sneak their cameras on rides. If you don't do it safely, then you are endangering everyones life. I never sneak cameras on rides anymore, I haven't in maybe a year or so now. Hell, I've gotten what you would call proper permission from the park owner himself before filming in the past. Remember at Solace 08 when some of us jetted off to Adventure City? Billy and I got approval from Alan Ansdell Jr, the park owner, to take POVs, and we took a couple mounted POVs of Freeway Coaster, the only coaster that was open during the visit.

Heck, at West Coast Bash 08, during the tour, we had a little bit of extra time since the Sky Tower part of it was closed due to wind. Most of my group went on Ninja. I sat next to some guy from the east coast. He took out his camera and was about to film a POV, then I told him it was not only against park policy, but that he was representing TPR by going to the event with them, and that Robb would possibly ban him if he found out. I got him to put away the camera and enjoy the ride. What I found out after the cycle was that it was a new credit for him. I mean come on man! You NEVER take a POV of a coaster you don't know! Even if the coaster doesn't invert, its still incredibly unsafe if you don't know the coaster.

In closing, where is the line? And why must such an art form be banished when done properly?

TLDR: I don't support onride media when done without safety in mind. Also, everyone runs around like chickens with their heads cut off when someone does it. Stop jumping to conclusions.

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

I for one never saw how taking your camera on a ride was illegal. Yes its against park policy, but if it was truly a law, then wouldn't it be illegal at all parks, on all rides? Maybe I'm just going crazy... If it really is a real law, someone get me some info on it.
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/7936/dscn1582pk3.jpg

There's other ways of not following park policies and introduction into civil court, but it's not worth getting into.


But what about when the proper steps are taken?
It's still unauthorized; no validity of methods used to attain photography.


Also, whats with ride-op approval not being good enough?
The people posting unauthorized content realize it's as such, and thus are inclined to lie about what he/she said.


Seriously, where is the real line to this? You don't need to see the restraints to know that its in the station, stationary. I remember I got under fire for this type of pic end of 07, and I know others that have been too. Is a pic taken in a stationary train as dangerous as a pic in a train in motion?
The very fact a ride vehicle cannot be proved in motion. Moreover, the venue may have restrictions from on-ride because they do not want to publicly display a viewpoint from the patron's point of view.


And why must such an art form be banished when done properly?
[See next quote]


I don't support on-ride media when done without safety in mind. Also, everyone runs around like chickens with their heads cut off when someone does it.
The photographer's view of what's "safe" is often highly skewed, and incorrect. They are wrong majority of the time.


----


Again, if you have any further questions on the subject, please feel free to IM, Email, or PM me.

Further discussion will be removed.

[Arez]

First off, I'd like to point out that RCPro's policy doesn't state anything about forbidding it's members from taking on ride media. If you must break park policy and sneak your cameras onto rides, that's your decision, and no ones going to stop you. But what the policy does state, is that no on ride media may be posted to the site...a fairly simple request to follow, is it not? It's just more of a respect issue towards RCPro and the Parks than anything else.


And why must such an art form be banished when done properly?

Everyone thinks they are doing it properly. Until they lose their camera.

-Alex

[Jake]

There is a similar sign to what was posted by Ryan in Ghostrider's station. Just so you guys know it holds true in California as well.

In response to Alex..

I think that's what people are arguing though. Why does RCPro prohibit on ride media that is perfectly legal? Because they can't be bothered to sort between the two? I don't think laziness is ever a good excuse.

[Steve K]

It is not our responsibility as RCPro Staff to contact every single park out there to find out their policy on taking on-ride media, or to contact the state in which the park/s are in to find out whether there are laws regarding following posted park signs. We do not have the time, or the resources to make this kind of coordination, nor are we obligated to do so.

We firmly believe in abiding by park policies and laws set forth by majority of the states that forbid on-ride media, and we encourage users to do the same. We can not prevent users from filming on-ride, nor do we enforce it, however we do request that users not post their on-ride media on RCPro and we will enforce the policy that we have set. Every website has their own policies, and that is ours.

As far as whether in-motion or not, it does not matter. If there is any possibility that the train is in motion, then it is considered on-ride as I already told you JD. Restraints up proves that the train is stationary as opposed to trains possibly just starting to roll out of the station, which may appear stationary.

Now as was previously said, this topic is brought up every so often and our stance has not changed. If you have any additional comments, please contact myself via PM or email. Any further discussions on this topic will be promptly deleted without hesitation.

[jolash]

I have an idea. How about a way that members can leave reviews on rides? Once the reviews are submitted, they are reviewed for legitimacy and value (to remove the "OMGZ! dis ride rokz!!") and then posted under the ride's page in the photo gallery.

[Jake]

^ I think that would be a cool idea.

[jolash]

I actually have another idea to take it one further. How about a full coaster counter with a rating system, much like Coasterfanatics or Coasterforce? But, to make it a little more unique, why not include flats? And how about a 1-100 scale instead of the typical 1-10? On each ride's page would feature its photo gallery. Thoughtful reviews are also welcome to be posted by members, just as I had explained above. This sounds like a lot of work, but I think it would help the site so much and would draw a lot of attention.

[Jake]

I think it would be interesting if you had the rides rated in five categories (Airtime, speed, thrill factor.. etc.) and then added the points that all those categories got together. It would certainly be a big project, but I think it would be well worth the trouble in the end.

[jolash]

That's actually a fantastic idea. We could possibly use the several factors that Mitch Hawker lists on his poll, which I know are Sensation of Speed, Lateral Gs, Out of Control Feeling, Airtime, Positive Gs, and I believe there is one more, but 5 would be good.

[Jake]

Those would be perfect categories, and I do think five is a good number of categories because it would split into 10, 50, 100, etc. evenly. However if we could come up with then categories I think we would be even better off! Granted, I had trouble with coming up with five off the top of my head - so that may be a bit out of our reach.

I'll im you so we can stop clogging up this thread.

[Michael]

^^ I think Lateral and positive g's could be combined into one category: intensity.

I think 5 that would work well are Intensity, Airtime, Direction Changes, Pacing, and Layout. But that's me.

[Steve K]

Those are all great ideas and are already being considered as a future feature of RCPro. :)

Thanks for the suggestions!

[Brandon]

I've noticed for the past two weeks, things on the homepage have been broken, such as images and links. Perhaps those need to be fixed? Just thought someone should point that out, since I havent seen anyone say it yet.

[Steve K]

More specifically, what are you refering to? If you can give a list of the errors and email them to me, I can take care of them ASAP.

[Michael]

No problems for me. Brandon, what browser are you using?

[Steve K]

The issue has been identified and is being worked on. The problem only occurs in Internet Explorer and should not affect users who use more 'HTML compliant' browsers such as Opera and Firefox.

Issue will be resolved shortly.

[p0tat0]

Wheres teh sickles??

[Thrill Reconnoiter]

Wheres teh sickles??
Priorities came to play, with work and school, starting a new life. He may be back one day, though.

It's rumored he still floats around these forums from time to time, browsing threads and seeing what's happening.

[Steve K]

The issue with the homepage should now be resolved. Any user using IE that still has an issue, please let me know via PM or email. Thanks. :)

[thedeadfrog]

How about reviving Switchback?

If i knew what was needed, I wouldn't mind writing a few articles about events happening around the site...

[mitchellPAUL]

I'm hoping this is the right thread, but I have a question. Is anyone else having log in problems? I click the remember me box, but it never does, and about every 10 minutes or so I have to log myself back in. It's really frustrating and annoying. Is anyone else experiencing this, or am I just an unfortunate soul?

[RollermanDan]

Are you running Firefox?

[mitchellPAUL]

Yes, is that why it's doing this?

[Steve K]

Do you have cookies enabled? Also, do you close your Firefox browser during your visit to the site?

[mitchellPAUL]

I think I figured it out. I had it on my exceptions list for saving passwords.

[rollercoasterfreak91]

Working fine for me, and I'm running firefox.

[Michael]

I've been thinking about the recent "activity" around and off the forums lately. I won't bring anything specific up (to avoid naming anyone), but I'm kind of fed up to say the least.

Whether you like the changes or not, ditching rcpro is only going to make you look worse. Sometimes things have to change, like it or not. Members and staff should stand up for the forum, and leaving isn't going to do anything. I personally don't like some of the changes, but I won't leave. I'll voice my opinion quite clearly.

I think the NCR has a few advantages, and a few disadvantages. It undoubtedly will bring back a less "hardcore" approach to the forums. Whether that is good or bad is up to your interpretation, but it will make the mood less coaster oriented nonethless.

As far as specific suggestions go, I'd like to make a few. Personally, I think rcpro has been primarily focused on Southern California and Florida. I don't think it would hurt if we had another major focus: the midwest. I think a great park to focus some attention on would be Cedar Point. I have a few reasons for my theory. Cedar Point in general is a very, very popular amusement park. There is a huge fanbase that rcpro really doesn't see alot of compared to other sites. Other than Southern California and SFMM, Cedar Point is the other major hub for coaster enthusiasts in the United States. In the surrounding area you have parks like Kings Island, Great America, Dorney, and even Holiday World. Another reason for putting some influence on Cedar Point is that there are quite a few members of rpcro that are close to these parks and would probably be willing to provide some content to the site. I really think rcpro could make leaps and bounds if we put some major focus on the midwest.

[DR27]

^ And I'm hoping to purchase a Season Pass for SF, so I can get an input aswell.

[Tom]

Starting in January, I will be able to do some midwest updates if need be. I will be 2 hours from Worlds of Fun, and will be traveling across the region all next summer. If that would be wanted, let me know and I am sure to make it happen.

[rollercoasterfreak91]

Hmmm...this may need to be 2009 suggestions soon... :D

Anyways, my question is about a podcast. I don't know how many of you followed the whole Robb Alvey on In The Loop thing. (BUFFET!), but it got me thinking about podcasts. Is an RCPro podcast possible? I think it'd be cool to have a couple guys from the site just record a podcast about amusement industry news, maybe add some special features unique to this podcast...I think it could be cool. I'm kinda thinking on this...Anyways, if it's possible to go through with that idea...I volunteer to help out. :)

[JD71]

It was going to happen a while ago, but never took off.

I still have the logo I tried to design for it:
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f361/jdsmartdude911/RCProcast2.gif
Wow I've come a long way in photoshop since then...


Anyways, I'd love to see it happen.

[Michael]

I would absolutely love an RcProcast if it ever came to. :)

[rollercoasterfreak91]

See, I think this could be fun. I'd like to be a cohost, since you can't have just one person. I was thinking use Skype to have a conference call and record it...not hard.

[Steve K]

RCProCast, as JD mentioned, was in the planning stages a while back but was never really followed. As we move into 2009 we are looking into more interactive features, one of which may include a future podcast. Our first step in this direction was obviously RCPro: Blogged, and progression will continue to be made towards interactivity within the site as that is an area RCPro has lacked in quite some time.

Good suggestion!

[rollercoasterfreak91]

OK, cool. I'd be willing to start heading that up right now if you want. All that's really needed from RCPro is to host it and post it on some page...or even in the forum temporarily.